HAIL DUBYUS!

An Illustrated Guide to Mendacity and Folly in the Imperium Americanum

The LONE STRANGER Solipsizes Again!

Bookmark Me!
[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

2004-02-05-powell_explains_intent.jpg

(Reuters) Powell Says Invasion Justified by Iraqi ‘Intent’

After that little problem with Heloise left him bereft of his Johnson, Peter Abelard thought LOTS about the nature of sin. He decided that performing an evil act is merely a crime, the sin is the decision to do evil, i.e., the intent. He also examined the hypothetical situation of a bunch of nuns tying up a monk and forcing him to have sex with them in terms of whether or not the monk had committed a sin by his nonconsentual participation…nope–seeeeeee, no intent!

He was pretty weird…

Share This Post