HAIL DUBYUS!

An Illustrated Guide to Mendacity and Folly in the Imperium Americanum

Trying to Have it Both Ways

Bookmark Me!
[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

2008-04-30-miley-cyrus3.jpg

Ahhh, Hannah Montana, such a boundless bundle of innocent energy, leading a double life as an ordinary person and a tween idol. And guess what? looks like Miley Cyrus has at least two (if not three) lives she’s leading as well–how life doth imitate art. Lemme see, she’s one of those super-talented Disney kids growing in the hothouse atmosphere of Disney exploitation, a Christian doing it all for Jesus, and … what’s this? a normal girl? Someplace buried under the hyped up talent and the hyped up sweet Christian innocence? Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying she isn’t talented. She’s at least as talented as a couple hundred thousand kids her age who DON’T have a famous dad and a multibillion dollar conglomerate behind her. And I’m sure her faith is, well, about as genuine as any 15 year-old’s who hasn’t found out about real life yet (something that, if she’s careful, she’ll never really have to do and can become President). But has she had a taste of it this time?

You better believe she hasn’t. Look at that Vanity Fair shot by La Leibovitz. Standard Vanity Fair, umm, fare. Right? None of us would have any objection to that shot if it was one of Annie’s standard subjects, une dame d’un certain age who was still trying to look hot. Or even a younger woman, except she’d probably prefer to get her exposure in Playboy and show even more. Miley, as her fans have said, isn’t showing ANYTHING. But that misses the point of what the photograph suggests it is showing. A naked girl sitting with bed sheets over the censorable bits with a smoldering pout and an inviting come-hither look in her eyes. But she isn’t in bed–oh? why bed sheets? But it was just supposed to be “artistic”. Yeah, right.

Miley isn’t so innocent she didn’t know what she was doing. If she didn’t, there were family members and members of her entourage with her to protect her. Tho’ I have my doubts about Billy Ray’s ability to see past “ooo, that’s a hot pose, Miley.” You KNOW they had approval over which shots would be included in the magazine layout. As did the Disney organization, since she’s their most profitable commodity of the moment. So no one was pulling the wool over anyone’s eyes. Certainly not Annie Leibovitz who knew exactly what she was doing. She knew she wasn’t just photographing a pretty girl, she was photographing a pretty piece of JAILBAIT. And it would do wonders for VF’s circulation and her own reputation. No, this was a calculated move on everyone’s part. What gets me pig-biting mad (Ed Anger, where are you now?) is the hypocrisy of everyone involved. Miley Vaniley over there isn’t gonna lose any of her fanbase from this, so she didn’t risk anything and she’s prepped her way to crotch-grabbing Britney Spears-dom after she graduates from the Mousergarten, and remember, little Britney became even more popular after she became legal, until she decided to play house and her widdle brain went all ’splodey. Yeah, a few moms will have second thoughts, but the kids will support their heroine. But watch out Hanna Montana, that path is littered with rockets that burned out on re-entry…

Share This Post

And To Add Insult To Injury, They Even Put My Gloves On Backwards

Bookmark Me!
[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

2007-05-14-kim_possible_in_clink_3.jpg

(CourtTV)N.Y. high school cheerleader plans to sue over arrest for missing uniform

(AFP) Defiant Hamas TV airs resistance Mickey again

HI Boys and Girls, How would YOU like to learn how to attach a detonator to C4? Hey, if you’re going to preach Jihad, come up with your own character, don’t appropriate a universally beloved symbol of childhood innocence and fun. Of course, Hamas doesn’t have a monopoly on appalling crap. I’m talking about the New Lebanon School District in New York and the New Lebanon deputy who stuck a cheerleader in jail for allegedly stealing her uniform. I mean, WTF? Couldn’t they call in her parents instead of taking such draconian measures? Did they ever consider that the girl might not even be guilty? The charges were eventually dropped, as they should have been, and the girl and her family are suing, as indeed they have every reason to. What douchebags.

On the other hand, it did give me an excuse to do a homage/parody of Kim Possible, one of the best cartoons on TV. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get Rufus in the panel LOL.

Share This Post

This Is ONE Fish Story That Won’t Be One Of Dubya’s Greatest Moments As President…

Bookmark Me!
[Ask] [Bloglines] [del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Fark] [Google] [MySpace] [Newsvine] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!]

2006-09-08-potomac_intersex_bass.jpg

(Newsday) ‘Intersex’ bass discovered in Potomac River

(WashPost) Male Bass Across Region Found to Be Bearing Eggs: Pollution Concerns Arise In Drinking-Water Source

(SeattleTimes) Best moment as president was catching a largemouth bass, Bush says

That’s Going Too Far: Bush’s fish story, part II

I think this cartoon (and its source stories) speaks for itself, but what I want to talk about is the impending 9/11 Fifth Anniversary mediablitz, and especially, the “docu-drama” going to be shown on ABC that purports to be based on the 9/11 Commission Report, but contains a whole host of inaccuracies, all to the benefit of the current administration. Seems they had themselves vetted by the Republican committee chair and promised Rush Limbaugh through a friend that it would skewer the Clinton administration. Now, ordinarily, I’m very laissez-faire in the free speech department, but I believe that common carriers like television networks have a duty not to promulgate propaganda, particularly when, as originally planned, this docudrama was going to be shown to school kids in study programs. Fortunately, SCHOLASTIC has decided NOT to support it with study materialsScholastic squashes ‘The Path to 9/11′ guide (replacing them with materials “focusing on media literacy, critical thinking and historical background.”), but heck, a lot of ADULTS are going to watch this and think it’s basically a dramatization of the 9/11 report, which seems to be FAR from the case. Anyway, check out Media Matters for more information. Think Progress has a petition here if you care to protest. The innocent victims of 9/11 deserve to be memorialized by the truth, not by partisan fingerpointing. ABC claims that any criticism is misplaced because “editing” had not yet been finished…less than a week before the showing of a five-hour miniseries? Oh, yeah :)

UPDATE: MoveOn.Org has this to say: “In a little over 48 hours, ABC will air a five-hour “docudrama” on the 9/11 attacks. The movie was written and produced by a right-wing activist who fabricated key scenes to blame Democrats and defend Republicans.1 It’s so partisan that even Rush Limbaugh was surprised ABC decided to air it.2 And an FBI agent who was brought in to consult on the docudrama quit because, he said, “they were making things up.”3 …It’s not just that ABC’s movie is slanted. Big parts of it are simply untrue. The producer himself even admitted to simply improvising a key scene which depicts the Clinton administration letting bin Laden go when they had him in their sights[^]a complete fabrication.5 Last night, the movie’s star, Harvey Keitel, said “It turned out not all the facts were correct.”6Click here to sign MoveOn’s petition going to ABC.

Share This Post
keep looking »